<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Transnational Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:16:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>German Supreme Court strikes down choice of court agreement prorogating courts of Virginia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/german-supreme-court-strikes-down-choice-of-court-agreement-prorogating-courts-of-virginia/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/german-supreme-court-strikes-down-choice-of-court-agreement-prorogating-courts-of-virginia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darius Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil law systems like the German one address jurisdictional questions through inflexible, statutorily-defined grounds of jurisdiction. Courts lack power to dismiss cases for forum non conveniens, and they have no discretion to accept jurisdiction when a valid choice-of-court agreement specifies a different forum. German legal scholars are particularly skeptical towards “flexible” common law jurisdictional doctrines<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/german-supreme-court-strikes-down-choice-of-court-agreement-prorogating-courts-of-virginia/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/german-supreme-court-strikes-down-choice-of-court-agreement-prorogating-courts-of-virginia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sovereign Immunity in Enforcement Proceedings – The decision of the German Supreme Court in Walter Bau vs. Government of Thailand</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/sovereign-immunity-in-enforcement-proceedings-%e2%80%93-the-decision-of-the-german-supreme-court-in-walter-bau-vs-government-of-thailand/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/sovereign-immunity-in-enforcement-proceedings-%e2%80%93-the-decision-of-the-german-supreme-court-in-walter-bau-vs-government-of-thailand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 14:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darius Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a study by the School of International Arbitration of the Queen Mary College, University of London[1] over 90 % of the awards are complied with voluntarily. In recent years arbitral awards rendered against states or state parties have often resulted in multijurisdictional battles at the post award stage when the private party tried<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/sovereign-immunity-in-enforcement-proceedings-%e2%80%93-the-decision-of-the-german-supreme-court-in-walter-bau-vs-government-of-thailand/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/04/sovereign-immunity-in-enforcement-proceedings-%e2%80%93-the-decision-of-the-german-supreme-court-in-walter-bau-vs-government-of-thailand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Few Words on the New Czech Act on Private International Law</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/03/a-few-words-on-the-new-czech-act-on-private-international-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/03/a-few-words-on-the-new-czech-act-on-private-international-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 05:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darius Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of January 2014 a new private law recodification will enter into effect in the Czech Republic. While the cornerstone of this significant change of the Czech private law landscape is primarily the new Civil Code (No. 89/2012 Coll.) and the new Business Corporations Act (No. 90/2012 Coll.), international readers might be interested in the<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/03/a-few-words-on-the-new-czech-act-on-private-international-law/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/03/a-few-words-on-the-new-czech-act-on-private-international-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professor Linda Silberman&#8217;s Article on International Child Abduction-Interpreting the Hague Abduction Convention:</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/professor-linda-silbermans-article-on-international-child-abduction-interpreting-the-hague-abduction-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/professor-linda-silbermans-article-on-international-child-abduction-interpreting-the-hague-abduction-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cr100</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faculty News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Search of a Global Jurisprudence, 38 U.C.Dav. L. Rev. 1049 (2005) &#8211; was cited in Justice Ginsburg&#8217;s concurring opinion in the recent decision Chafin v. Chafin (Feb. 19, 2013).  The Court held unanimously that an appeal from an order of return of the child to Scotland was not moot, notwithstanding that no stay had<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/professor-linda-silbermans-article-on-international-child-abduction-interpreting-the-hague-abduction-convention/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/professor-linda-silbermans-article-on-international-child-abduction-interpreting-the-hague-abduction-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German Supreme Court Once Again Cites Paper by Franco Ferrari in Ruling on International Sales Law</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/german-supreme-court-once-again-cites-paper-by-franco-ferrari-in-ruling-on-international-sales-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/german-supreme-court-once-again-cites-paper-by-franco-ferrari-in-ruling-on-international-sales-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cr100</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faculty News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Germany cited a paper by Professor Franco Ferrari in a decision concerning the value to be attributed to a given INCOTERM. Professor Ferrari, who is the director of the Law School&#8217;s Center for Transnational Litigation and Commercial Law, is an expert on international sales law. In its November 7, 2012, the<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/german-supreme-court-once-again-cites-paper-by-franco-ferrari-in-ruling-on-international-sales-law/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/german-supreme-court-once-again-cites-paper-by-franco-ferrari-in-ruling-on-international-sales-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arbitration and Right of Access to Justice: Tips for a Successful Marriage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/arbitration-and-right-of-access-to-justice-tips-for-a-successful-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/arbitration-and-right-of-access-to-justice-tips-for-a-successful-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darius Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right of access to justice guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) and arbitration are predetermined to have a difficult relationship. The ECHR secures everyone the right to have their civil claims brought before a court or a tribunal[i] and financial obstacles should not impact this right.[ii] On the<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/arbitration-and-right-of-access-to-justice-tips-for-a-successful-marriage/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/arbitration-and-right-of-access-to-justice-tips-for-a-successful-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context&#8221; Conference</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/forum-shopping-in-the-international-commercial-arbitration-context-conference-from-feb-28th-to-march-2nd/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/forum-shopping-in-the-international-commercial-arbitration-context-conference-from-feb-28th-to-march-2nd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cr100</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYU&#8217;s Center for Transnational Litigation and Commercial Law will host a conference on &#8220;Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context&#8221; The list of speakers include Prof. George A. Bermann, Ms. Christopher Boog, Prof. Jack Coe, Jr., Prof. Filip De Ly, Mr. Domenico Di Pietro, Mr. John Fellas, Prof. Franco Ferrari, Mr. Brian King, Mr.<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/forum-shopping-in-the-international-commercial-arbitration-context-conference-from-feb-28th-to-march-2nd/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/02/forum-shopping-in-the-international-commercial-arbitration-context-conference-from-feb-28th-to-march-2nd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Role for the Permanent Court of Arbitration Today?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/what-role-for-the-permanent-court-of-arbitration-today/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/what-role-for-the-permanent-court-of-arbitration-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cr100</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 11th, the Center &#8211; in collaboration with The American Society of International Law &#8211; will host a panel discussion on the role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration today. The event will feature keynote remarks by PCA Secretary General Hugo H. Siblesz and a distinguished panel of experts, Michael Reisman, Yale Law School<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/what-role-for-the-permanent-court-of-arbitration-today/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/what-role-for-the-permanent-court-of-arbitration-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Seat of Arbitration Still Matter? Can Italy be a &#8220;Good&#8221; Place for Arbitration?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/does-the-seat-of-arbitration-still-matter-can-italy-be-a-good-place-for-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/does-the-seat-of-arbitration-still-matter-can-italy-be-a-good-place-for-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 02:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darius Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Introduction On November 16, 2012, the Milan Chamber of Arbitration has hosted its 3rd Annual Conference in international arbitration. The aim of this contribution is to briefly report the lively discussion related to the main topic of the conference – the seat of arbitration &#8211; to express some comments on this issue and hopefully<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/does-the-seat-of-arbitration-still-matter-can-italy-be-a-good-place-for-arbitration/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2013/01/does-the-seat-of-arbitration-still-matter-can-italy-be-a-good-place-for-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confidentiality vs. Transparency In Commercial Arbitration: A False Contradiction To Overcome</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2012/12/confidentiality-vs-transparency-in-commercial-arbitration-a-false/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2012/12/confidentiality-vs-transparency-in-commercial-arbitration-a-false/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 06:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darius Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Introduction: the general context of confidentiality in commercial arbitration As it has been stated by the French newspaper “Le Figaro” on September 9, 2008, “the custom is not to say who arbitrated what”. Confidentiality is considered to be one of the crucial features of commercial arbitration. Historically, arbitration proceedings – as well as arbitral<a href="http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2012/12/confidentiality-vs-transparency-in-commercial-arbitration-a-false/">Read the Rest...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2012/12/confidentiality-vs-transparency-in-commercial-arbitration-a-false/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
